12-16-2016, 08:14 PM
Alwarren, McGregor wrote:
The whole discussion is legitimate of course, and everybody are entitles to voice their preferences, I never meant to say otherwise. My opinion is that in a lot of cases, more liberal equipment assignment, that might even be less realistic, can make missions better, and that's what I was trying to convey in the rest of my post.
(12-16-2016, 03:20 PM)McGregor Wrote: My reasonings for not including GPS are because I consider it over used to a degree of absurdity where people suddenly turn blind with out it. In this mission for example we all knew exactly where we were going and we landed no more than 50 m off the mark and there is nothing else there but the two compounds and the nearby village.And you replied:
(12-16-2016, 03:20 PM)Alwarren Wrote: That is my point. I don't see how a GPS for the team leader would make it any worse. The only reason you did not include them is "out of spite", so to speak. You don't have any other reason.So that's why I pointed out that it's uncalled for. Maybe it's lost in translation, but I never meant to say it's offensive, just not true and ignoring the reasoning that was clearly given.
The whole discussion is legitimate of course, and everybody are entitles to voice their preferences, I never meant to say otherwise. My opinion is that in a lot of cases, more liberal equipment assignment, that might even be less realistic, can make missions better, and that's what I was trying to convey in the rest of my post.
The fewer men, the greater share of honor